The
YouTube video,
'Endangering Prosperity: A Global View of the American School,'
provides a brief overview of the relative performance of U.S.
students on international tests. Write a short response to the video
describing the issues raised, the lessons you took away from the
video, and how it fits (or doesn't) with your thinking on education
politics and policy.
The
teaser video for Endangering Prosperity takes a look at how kids in
the United States rank 32nd
on the worldwide PISA tests started in 2000. And even ten years
after our initial poor showing in the PISA results, the US is still
in the middle of the international pack. The video doesn't go into
much specific detail about why we're 32nd
or what might change our ranking, but it does point out that spending
more money is not necessarily the answer. Other countries (and
specific states within the US) get better results while spending less
money. The video states that if we want to have a strong economy
and be solving the big problems of the world, then we need some deep
change in education – we've seen deep changes in how technology
affects our home and work lives, but not yet in education.
The
biggest lesson/reminder I took away from the video was about the
money – while we certainly need some money to educate children,
just throwing money at the issue won't help. We need to spend the
money wisely on programs and systems that work. This is especially
relevant to my interests in early childhood education, as universal
preschool is gaining support currently. Federal and state
governments are looking to spend many billions on early ed, yet while
small high-quality preschool experiments have shown tremendous
results, larger scaled-up programs often haven't shown significant
results. What change needs to happen in the classroom, in the
school, in the system, in order to produce the results that we know
are possible? What insights can we take from other countries, as
well as from within our country, about what works?
One
issue that the video doesn't mention, but that I think about when
looking at international comparisons... Are the higher-ranked
countries smaller/less populous than the US? From a pure statistics
perspective, the law of large numbers states that the larger the
population, the more likely we'll be close to the mean. And from a
scaling-up-programs perspective, it's easier to implement reforms
with fewer students. We're dealing with a larger and more
complicated issue than most countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment